Skip to main content

15.04.2024

Re-examining Geospatial Online Participatory Tools for Environmental Planning

verfasst von: Julie M. Minde, Andrea K. Gerlak, Tony Colella, Anna M. Murveit

Erschienen in: Environmental Management

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Geospatial online participatory tools, or geo-OPTs, are increasingly used worldwide for engaging the public in planning. Yet, despite growth in the adoption and use of geo-OPTs, and the growing scholarship to accompany it, our understanding of their ability to support public participation in environmental planning is still underdeveloped. In this paper, we investigate the application of a geo-OPT by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), a leading water management agency in the United States, in three contextually and geographically diverse cases. Through a combination of document analysis, interviews, and participant observation, we examine the processes and dynamics associated with the development and use of the geo-OPT Crowdsource Reporter. Our findings highlight the importance of managing geo-OPTs not in isolation or as a panacea but rather as part of a broader planning process that recognizes the complexity and significance of communication in geo-OPT processes. Although it may be tempting and seemingly simple to create and launch these online tools, our research reveals how a lack of intention early on may lead to underuse or misapplication of the tool. More significantly, real damage can be done, like increased public frustration and alienation, resulting in breakdown in communications or even worsening public relations for federal agencies.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong, R.L. President. Letter to Colonel Andrew J. Short. June 12, 2019 Armstrong, R.L. President. Letter to Colonel Andrew J. Short. June 12, 2019
Zurück zum Zitat Beierle TC (2010) Democracy in practice: public participation in environmental decisions. RoutledgeCrossRef Beierle TC (2010) Democracy in practice: public participation in environmental decisions. RoutledgeCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brabham DC (2013) Using crowdsourcing in government. IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DCCrossRef Brabham DC (2013) Using crowdsourcing in government. IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DCCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DuPraw ME, Cardwell HE, Placht MT, McGonigle T (2012) Assessing the collaborative capacity of the US Army Corps of Engineers: Relevant literature, a practical assessment tool, and reflections on third‐party roles. Confl Resolut Q 30(1):81–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21056CrossRef DuPraw ME, Cardwell HE, Placht MT, McGonigle T (2012) Assessing the collaborative capacity of the US Army Corps of Engineers: Relevant literature, a practical assessment tool, and reflections on third‐party roles. Confl Resolut Q 30(1):81–132. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​crq.​21056CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Emerson K, Nabatchi T, O’Leary (2017) Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution. In Environmental Governance Reconsidered, 263-296. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press Emerson K, Nabatchi T, O’Leary (2017) Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution. In Environmental Governance Reconsidered, 263-296. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press
Zurück zum Zitat Huitema D, Mostert E, Egas W, Moellenkamp S, Pahl-Wostl C, Yalcin R (2009) Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecol Soc 14(1). http://www.jstor.org/stable/26268026 Huitema D, Mostert E, Egas W, Moellenkamp S, Pahl-Wostl C, Yalcin R (2009) Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecol Soc 14(1). http://​www.​jstor.​org/​stable/​26268026
Zurück zum Zitat Langton S (1996) An Organizational Assessment of the US Army Corps of Engineers in Regard to Public Involvement Practices and Challenges. US Army Engineers Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, VA Langton S (1996) An Organizational Assessment of the US Army Corps of Engineers in Regard to Public Involvement Practices and Challenges. US Army Engineers Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, VA
Zurück zum Zitat Mossberger K (2000) The politics of ideas and the spread of enterprise zones. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DCCrossRef Mossberger K (2000) The politics of ideas and the spread of enterprise zones. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DCCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Re-examining Geospatial Online Participatory Tools for Environmental Planning
verfasst von
Julie M. Minde
Andrea K. Gerlak
Tony Colella
Anna M. Murveit
Publikationsdatum
15.04.2024
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Environmental Management
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-01973-7